Investigating the efficiency of companies in order to evaluate the effect of ownership transfer to the private sector

Number of pages: 101 File Format: word File Code: 29752
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Librarianship
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the efficiency of companies in order to evaluate the effect of ownership transfer to the private sector

    Dissertation for receiving the master degree "M.S"

    Accounting

    Abstract

    One of the topics that has attracted the attention of many economists today is the issue of transferring the shares of government institutions to the private sector. There are debates and disagreements among economists and researchers about the efficiency and effectiveness of some companies in the private sector. One of the main objectives of privatization has been mentioned as increasing the efficiency of state-owned enterprises, but the experience of privatization has not been proven as a suitable solution for solving government problems and economic progress. In this research, an attempt has been made to evaluate the success of privatization by measuring the efficiency of companies.  For this purpose, the profitability returns, which are among the criteria of interest to the users of financial statements, have been tested at different times, and in this regard, 35 companies from among the companies accepted in the Tehran Stock Exchange, which operate in the private sector, have been examined in the period from 1386 to 1392. This research includes the independent variables of privatization and the percentage of privatization; In order to compare the items of profitability returns before and after privatization, the t-test with paired samples was used, and the independent sample t-test was used to measure the different levels of transfer in the form of specific percentages. According to the analysis done for the research variables, it was found that there is a significant difference between the sales efficiency of companies before and after privatization. There is a significant difference between the return on assets of companies before and after privatization. There is a significant difference between the return on equity of companies before and after privatization. The analysis made regarding the different levels of handing over resulted that the high percentage of privatization does not affect the sales yield. A high percentage of privatization has an effect on asset returns. The high percentage of privatization affects the return on equity. Key words: privatization, return on sales, return on assets, return on equity.

     

     

     

    Chapter One

    General Research

    1-1: Introduction

    Privatization is a set of actions in which different levels of control, ownership and management are transferred from the public sector to the private sector. The limits and methods of interference in the economy have always been the subject of many economists' debates. Although the belief of classical economists such as Adam Smith [1], David Ricardo [2], Jean-Baptiste C[3] and... was not a complete negation of the role of governments, it can be said that their belief was that the government's intervention was very limited. (Bakhshizadeh and Mashidi, Dunyai Ekhtaz newspaper).

    Researches show that in terms of growth, private companies in competitive industries are much more efficient than government companies. Many policy variables such as: financial discipline, prices and trade liberalization, elimination of redundant regulations, privatization and clarification of property rights are important to determine the rate of growth. Paying attention to each of these things separately may have a limited effect on the rate of growth, but in general, they are strongly related to rapid development (Ashrafi) [4].

    In this research, we try to measure whether the advancement of this process can be a solution in the development of the economy or not?

    1-2: Statement of the problem

    One of the controversial issues that has attracted the attention of many economists these days is the issue of part handover. It is from the activities of government agencies to the private sector. Due to the broad level of the government's duties, it is not possible to apply accurate and effective control over all sectors, when the government tries to take over all the affairs alone, it causes shortcomings and inefficiencies in the economy. Therefore, entering the private sector in order to advance part of the government's goals can be considered an effective solution. In this research, an attempt is made to investigate whether the entry of the private sector has been successful in fulfilling this goal, or has not had an impact on improving the conditions, or perhaps has not yet reached the stage of implementation that was predicted.

    One of the important reasons for turning to privatization can be mentioned is the improvement of efficiency, financial performance and efficiency of companies. Due to the broad level of the government's duties, it is not possible to apply accurate and effective control over all departments.. The objectives of privatization can be deduced from the same shortcomings and inadequacies in the performance of state-owned companies. The purpose of this research is to evaluate the effect of transfer of ownership to the private sector, by examining the returns of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange in the period between 1386 and 1392. In developed countries, the implementation of this policy has met with success, while the results of most of the researches conducted in Iran indicate the failure of this policy in the first (1368) and second (1374) development plans, and the lack of a suitable financial market and lack of development can be stated among the reasons for the failure of this policy. Privatization in different countries can pursue different goals according to economic plans, but in any case, the common goal of all countries is to advance the economy towards being as efficient as possible. In the studies that have been done in different countries about privatization, most countries have been successful that have a suitable combination of public, cooperative and private sectors. Due to the broad level of the government's duties, it is not possible to apply strict and effective control over all sectors, therefore, it is not far off to expect inefficiency, inflation and budget deficit. In order not to face such problems and to improve efficiency and productivity, to expand the field of competition, to reduce their financial burden, to develop domestic capital markets and people's participation, governments engage in privatization. In most of the privatization options, in determining the performance of companies after privatization, it is important to be more profitable, higher efficiency and financially healthy.

    In this research, we try to examine the sales return, return on assets, and return on equity of companies that operate in the private sector in the three years before and after the transfer of ownership in order to measure their performance and to show the degree of success or failure of this policy in these companies. The different levels of handover after privatization should be compared in order to measure the relationship between the level of success and the level of handover.

    This information has been collected from the audited financial statements of the companies handed over to the private sector available on the Tehran Stock Exchange website.

    The weakening of the government's role in economic activities and handing over part of these tasks to the private sector does not mean that the government will be completely removed from interfering in the implementation of all affairs, the government will continue its duty as a supervisor. Even in cases where the private sector alone is not able to fully perform an economic activity, it benefits from the government's support. Of course, in some cases, the private sector is able to perform its activities in the best way without the need of the government.  The general purpose of this research is to investigate whether privatization can be effective in advancing the goals of the country's economy and take a step forward or not.

    This research includes two independent variables, one quantitative and the other qualitative, the effect of each of which will be examined separately on the dependent variables. has been assigned to the private sector.

    Dependent variables:

    1. Sales efficiency: [5] Sales efficiency or net profit margin is obtained by dividing net profit by sales. This ratio expresses the profit of each sales rial and expresses the percentage of net profit to sales.

    To calculate sales efficiency, we need net profit[6] and sales. The formula for calculating it is as follows.  Return on assets[8]: It is obtained by dividing the net profit by the total assets[9] and it represents the profit obtained per rial of the company's assets. To calculate the return on assets, we need net profit and total assets. The formula for calculating it is as follows. Return on equity[10]: It shows the company's ability to earn profit from the resources that the shareholders have provided to the company. To calculate the return on equity, we need net profit and average equity[11]. The formula for calculating it is as follows.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the efficiency of companies in order to evaluate the effect of ownership transfer to the private sector

    List:

    Table of Contents

    Page Title

    Abstract 1

    Chapter One: General Research

    1-1: Introduction. 3

    1-2: statement of the problem. 3

    1-3: The necessity of doing research. 6

    1-4: research assumptions. 7

    1-5: research objectives. 7

    1-6: research method. 8

    1-7: Information gathering tools. 10

    1-8: Challenges ahead. 10

    1-9: Research scope. 10

    1-10: Keywords. 11

    Chapter Two: Literature and Research Background

    2-1: Introduction. 13

    2-2: Evidence and experiences of privatization. 15

    2-3: Privatization. 16

    2-4: Privatization in advanced capitalist countries. 17

    2-5: The concept of privatization. 18

    2-6: Definitions of privatization. 19

    2-7: Real privatization, breathing new life into the body of the sick state economy. 21

    2-8: Privatization methods. 23

    2-9: Reasons for privatization. 24

    2-10: Privatization objectives. 26

    2-11: Obstacles to privatization in Iran. 27

    2-12: Privatization mechanism. 31

    2-13: Specialized parent company. 33

    2-14: Privatization from the perspective of laws. 33

    2-15: General policies of Article 44 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 39

    2-17: Privatization organization. 45

    2-18: Financial ratios. 46

    2-19: Profitability ratios. 47

    2-20: Efficiency. 47

    2-21: Motivations and characteristics of private companies compared to the public sector. 49

    2-22: Profitability and managerial efficiency. 51

    2-23: Analysis and interpretation of profitability ratios. 51

    2-24: Limitation of ratios 55

    2-25: Research background. 57

    Chapter Three: Research Methodology

    3-1 Introduction. 67

    3-2: Research method. 68

    3-3: Data collection tool 68

    3-4: Data analysis method 69

    3-5: Statistical population and statistical sample. 70

    3-6: research model, hypotheses and variables 71

    3-7: conclusion. 73

    Chapter 4: Research data analysis

    1-4: Introduction. 75

    4-2: Descriptive statistics of research variables. 75

    4-3: Examining the status of the distribution of variables 76

    4-4: Examining the assumptions of performance comparison in the years before and after privatization. 76

    4-5: Examining the assumptions of comparing the performance of transferred companies at different levels of transfer. 80

    Chapter Five: Conclusion

    5-1: Summary of the research. 85

    5-2: Conclusion and analysis of research findings. 85

    5-3: Suggestions. 86

    Persian sources and sources and foreign sources. 88

    Abstract. 92

    Source:

    Persian sources and sources and foreign sources

    Here some domestic and foreign sources are mentioned:

    A) List of Persian sources

    Adam Smith, Wealth of Nations, translated by Dr. Ahmad Shamsa, p. 52, 1st edition.

    Regards M. Farrokhi Ostad M. Farrokhi Ostad M. 1390. Investigating the role of handing over state-owned companies in increasing their profitability and efficiency, Public Management Research, 4th year, 13th issue, 1390, pp. 49-72.

    Farkhi Ostad M, Farkhi Ostad M. 2018. Investigating the role of the transfer of state-owned companies in increasing their profitability and efficiency, Public Management Research, 4th year, 13th issue, 2019, pp. 72-49.

    Aminzadeh M. 2018. Investigating the relationship between management quality and employee performance - a case study of Kurdistan Governorate and subordinate governorates. Faculty of Literature and Humanities. Azad University, Sanandaj branch. Inadequacies and limitations of financial ratios in decision-making. Master's thesis. Tarbiat Modares University.

    Pi Novo, Raymond, (1378), financial management, translated by Jahankhani A., Parsaian A., Tehran, Samit Publications, Volume 1.

    Hass Yeganeh Y., Raisi Z., Hosseini M. 1388. The relationship between the quality of corporate governance and the performance of companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange, Iranian Management Sciences Quarterly, Year 4, Number 13, 1388, pp. 75-100. Khalili Iraqi M. 1376. An examination of the forced substitution phenomenon in Iran's economy. Journal of economic research, Faculty of Economics, University of Tehran, number 51, autumn and winter.

    Razzaghi A. 1376. A critique on Iran's privatization, first edition). Tehran: Rasa Institute of Cultural Services. Rafiei. M. 1374.A comparative study of the performance of companies transferred to the private sector before and after the transfer in the process of privatization in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Master's thesis. Tarbiat Modares University.

    General policies of Article 44 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran, approved on 09/21/1383, official gazette date: 09/15/1385, notification date: 03/05/1384, notification number: 12581, publication number: 17995.

    Salaran. M. 2014. Examining the attitude of middle managers of Tehran Telecommunications Company regarding the effect of privatization on efficiency. Master's thesis. Tarbiat Modares University.

    Saeidi A, Babalovian SH. 1391. Financial and operational performance of companies subject to Article 44 listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange before and after privatization, Iran's Economic Research Quarterly, 2011, pp. 28-9.

    Shurvarzi and Mohammadi. 1390. Comparing the performance of companies before and after privatization, Islamic Azad University, Shiraz branch.

    Talibnia Q, Mohammadzadeh Salteh H, (1384), the effect of privatization of state-owned companies listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange on their stock returns, Financial Research, No. 19, Spring and Summer 13, pp. 115-97.

    Taibi K, Karmi M, Seriri H. 2013. Analysis of the degree of financial and commercial openness on the financial development of Iran and its trading partners, Rah Andisheh Economic Research Quarterly, Winter (1996-2009).

    Aiyar Rezaei b. 1388. The results of the evaluation of privatization in Iran, Kohsar Publications, Kablizadeh A., Tavakoli A. 1384, Popular privatization of efficiency with justice, first edition, Tehran, Publications: Islamic Council Research Center. Kamijani A. 1382. Evaluation of the performance of privatization policy in Iran (first edition). Tehran: Vice President of Economic Affairs. Hosseini Azan M. What is the best criterion for performance evaluation, pp. 121-145. Mosleh Shirazi, M. 2016. Expectation of the performance of government industries entrusted to the private sector?, Iranian Management Journal, No. 21, 2016, pp. 141-171 Creation or optimal combination of government and market (first edition). Nikomram E., Hibti F., 1388. Fundamentals of financial management - concepts, applications and theories, Tehran, Termeh Publications. 2018. Investigating the impact of privatization on productivity and optimal use of resources, Islamic Azad University, Semnan branch. Houshmand M, Daneshnia M. 1390. The impact of financial development on economic growth in Iran, two quarterly journal of monetary economics, finance (former knowledge and development), new period, 18th year, number 2, autumn and winter 1390. and Aghaee khondabi, M.(2009). "Financial development and Economic Growth: Comparison of OPEC oil and non-oil developing countries, using the Generalized Method of Moment". Economic Research, 1-25 (In Persian). 2. Ahmad, Ashfaq, Impact of Privatization on Banking Sector Performance of Pakistan. Banerjee, A., and et al. (1993). Co-integration, error-correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Advanced Texts in Econometrics. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Ben Naceur, M, and Ghazouani. B. (2007)." GMM estimation of empirical growth model". Working paper no. 2001-w21. University of oxford.

    Ochieng, Mulaku-Ahmad, Anwar, The Effects of Privatization on the Financial.

    6. Mansouri, Ali-Rostamkhani, Hossein-Ramazani, Morteza-Bayat, Ali, SCRUTINIZING THE IMPACT OF PRIVATIZATION OF STATE-OWNED COMPANIES ON FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE, International Journal of Current Life Sciences - Vol.4, Issue, 6, pp.2780-2787, June, 2014

    Goldsmith, R. W. (1969)." Financial structure and development". New Haven, CT7 Yale Univ. Press.

    Rasti, M. (2009). "The relationship between financial development and economic growth in OPEC member countries: testing Patrick's assumptions". Commercial Studies, 38, 59-67.  (In Persian) Translated by Hamid Reza Arbab, Tehran, Ney Publication (In Persian).

Investigating the efficiency of companies in order to evaluate the effect of ownership transfer to the private sector