Evaluation of financial performance and rating of insurance companies active in the stock exchange

Number of pages: 119 File Format: word File Code: 29682
Year: 2014 University Degree: Master's degree Category: Economics
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Evaluation of financial performance and rating of insurance companies active in the stock exchange

    Dissertation for Master's Degree in Industrial Management (M.A)

    Trend: Finance

    Abstract

    Capital market activists and stakeholders of stock supply companies need a tool so that they can compare similar companies and choose the desired stocks based on this and considering the purpose of investment. Therefore, the design of the model for evaluating the performance and rating of insurance companies as one of the active industries in the Tehran Stock Exchange has been the main goal of this research. In this research, in order to present the financial evaluation model of the insurance companies present in the stock exchange, using the Delphi method and the group AHP model, and by polling fifteen financial and supervisory experts of the insurance industry, the main factors and sub-factors of the model have been identified and prioritized. Then, using the obtained model and the information of the insurance companies present in the stock market, which were collected through valid and official documents, these companies were ranked. As a result of the research, the main factors of the model, in order of priority, include factors based on insurance activities with a weight of 0.706, factors based on the stock market with a weight of 0.164, and factors based on accounting with a weight of 0.130. In each category, factors have been identified to calculate the total score of the company. Finally, five companies present in the Tehran Stock Exchange have been ranked using the present model and by calculating financial, insurance and capital market indicators.

    Key words: rating, performance evaluation, insurance company, hierarchical analysis

    Chapter 1

    Research overview

    - Introduction

    In today's competitive world, only organizations and companies can compete and create profitability by paying special attention to planning and evaluating their performance compared to competitors. Since the survival of organizations is only possible through the optimal use of resources and facilities, the most obvious characteristic of any dynamic and growing organization is the effective evaluation and criticism of the activities and actions carried out over time, because it is only in the shadow of such an approach that decision-making based on information, and moving from daily routine and day-to-day planning to systematic planning is possible. This is much more tangible in organizations such as insurance because selling services is much more difficult than selling manufactured goods. The clearest reason for this is the visibility of goods, while the purchase of services generally has a different nature.

    Some researchers believe that a suitable performance evaluation tool should be able to include a wide range of performance criteria, others point out that performance evaluation tools should provide the possibility of comparative evaluations for organizations. Therefore, it is clear that the shareholders, managers, investors and other stakeholders in this situation need a model and a tool so that they can recognize the position of the company in relation to the competitors and the environment and make the necessary arrangements. In this research, indicators and sub-indices for measuring financial performance in insurance companies active in the Tehran Stock Exchange, the importance and weight of each index and sub-indicator are determined using decision-making methods in management, and finally, the ranking of insurance companies active in the stock exchange is discussed. and others [1], 2012). It is clear that managers in this situation need a tool so that they can identify their position in relation to competitors and the environment and make the necessary arrangements to achieve the next goals.

    Global experience indicates that the insurance industry, as a part of the financial industry, must have a proper mutual relationship with the capital market. This relationship, in the era of globalization, crystallizes in two ways: on the one hand, the development of the insurance business requires a strong capital market. and on the other hand, the growth of the capital market itself is based on the active participation of insurance funds in this market (Abde Tabrizi, 2010).

    One of the ways to expand the relationship between the insurance industry and the financial markets is to privatize and transfer insurance companies through the stock market from the public sector to the private sector. In different ways, government insurance companies can be handed over to non-government sectors. The three methods of selling assets, offering shares to the public, and issuing and distributing coupons are the most common methods of privatization.In the method of offering shares to the public, shares are offered freely and unconditionally to the private sector in the financial markets (stock exchange). This method has been favored by many countries due to its low cost and compliance with the market mechanism (Mahdavi, Siflo, 2019). Currently, some insurance companies such as Dana, Asia, Mellat and They are in Tehran Stock Exchange. Due to the fact that insurance companies engage in the purchase of risk, there are special items such as technical reserves in the financial statements of these companies. Lack of proper supervision and proper actuary can cause problems for the company in the long term and this issue is not reflected in the financial statements. Therefore, it is very necessary to provide an efficient model for evaluating the financial performance of insurance companies. Figure 1-1 shows the research problem by comparing the current and desired state.

    1-3- Research Objectives

    The objective of scientific research is to propose the correct and useful bases for decision-making in the field of solving organizational problems, together with reasons and objective evidence, the correct use of techniques, techniques and methods of analyzing information and facts.

    1-3-1- The main objective

    Determination and explanation The portfolio of main and secondary factors affecting the financial evaluation of insurance companies active in the stock exchange. 1-3-2- Sub-objectives Prioritization and weighting of the main and secondary factors affecting the financial evaluation of insurance companies active in the stock exchange. To provide a suitable and efficient model for the financial evaluation of insurance companies active in the stock exchange. 1-3-3- Practical objectives The purpose of this research is to explain the model The financial evaluation of insurance companies active in the stock market is the most important beneficiary of the current research results of insurance companies; And investors and capital market activists can use the results of the research.

    1-4- The importance of the research topic and the motivation for choosing it

    Today, organizations operate in an environment that is increasingly moving towards a value-based economy, and successful and progressive organizations identify their position in the market by planning and evaluating their performance and seek to use their strengths to create opportunities so that they can attract the attention of investors and increase the value of their shares. Financial metrics can be a good reflection of companies' performance and provide useful quantitative information about the operations and status of companies for investors and analysts at different times (Yelkin et al., 2012). In general, in financial evaluation models, two categories of criteria, accounting-based financial performance criteria[1] and value-based financial performance criteria[2] are examined. According to the opinions of financial experts, accounting-based criteria include asset return rate[3], equity[4], operating profit growth[5] and price-to-earnings ratio. Also, value-based criteria include economic added value [6], market added value [7], cash added value [8], refined economic added value, real added value [9], Qotubin and created shareholder value [10].

    According to what has been said and since there are a number of the most reliable companies in the country operating in the Tehran Stock Exchange, the existence of a suitable performance evaluation system, especially in the financial sector, is a reason for evaluating insurance companies. The performance of insurance companies is more transparent compared to other companies. This model can become an effective tool in making decisions for brokers and capital market investors to buy shares of insurance companies.

    1-5- Research questions

    1-5-1- The main question

    What are the main and secondary factors affecting the financial evaluation of insurance companies active in the stock market?

    1-5-2- Subquestions

    Prioritization of the main and secondary factors affecting the evaluation What is the finance of insurance companies active in the stock exchange?

    What is the ranking of insurance companies active in the stock exchange?

    1-6- Population and statistical sample

    This research was conducted on insurance companies active in the stock exchange, so the research population is Asia, Dana, Alborz, Parsian and Mellat insurance companies. Also, for interviews and surveys, experts who were managers of Central Insurance of J.A. have been used.

    1-7- Statistical sample selection method

    In this research, all the insurance companies present in the Tehran Stock Exchange have been evaluated. Therefore, this research did not have sampling and the research was carried out from the entire community. Regarding the selection of experts, central insurance managers and experts who have characteristics, relevance of the job to the topic of monitoring and evaluation and availability have been selected.

  • Contents & References of Evaluation of financial performance and rating of insurance companies active in the stock exchange

    List:

    Abstract 1

    Chapter One: General Research

    1-1- Introduction. 3

    1-2- statement of the problem. 3

    1-3- research objectives. 5

    1-4- The importance of the research topic. 5

    1-5- Research questions. 6

    1-6- Society and statistical sample. 6

    1-7- Statistical sample selection method. 6

    1-8- operational definitions of variables and keywords. 7

    1-9- Research design and data analysis methods 8

    1-10- Scope of research. 8

    1-10-1- Subject area of ??research. 8

    1-10-2- The spatial territory of the research. 8

    1-10-3- The time domain of research. 8

    1-11- chapter summary. 9

    Chapter Two: A review of research literature and research background

    Chapter Two - Part One 10

    2-1- Theoretical background. 11

    2-1-1- Introduction. 11

    2-1-2- Insurance industry. 11

    2-1-3- Necessity and importance of performance evaluation 13

    2-1-4- Performance evaluation 14

    2-1-5- Organizational performance evaluation approaches. 14

    2-1-6- Characteristics of efficient organizational performance evaluation system 15

    2-1-7- Multi-criteria financial performance evaluation 15

    2-1-8- Financial performance evaluation criteria. 17

    2-1-9- Performance based on accounting. 17

    2-1-10- "Sink and Tattle" model. 18

    2-1-11- Performance matrix 20

    2-1-12- Stakeholder analysis model. 20

    2-1-13- Structure and framework of organizational excellence model. 22

    2-1-14- Hierarchical analysis process (AHP model) 25

    Part II- History of similar research. 31

    2-2-1- Introduction. 32

    2-2-2- An overview of the history of similar domestic research. 32

    2-2-3- An overview of similar foreign research history. 35

    Chapter 3: Research implementation method

    3-1- Introduction. 41

    3-2- Typology of research. 42

    3-3- Choosing an expert 43

    3-4- Information collection tool. 43

    3-5- Validity and reliability of the questionnaire. 45

    3-6- Introducing the research model and steps. 46

    3-7- Data collection method 47

    3-8- Data analysis method 48

    3-9- Software introduction. 50

    3-10- chapter summary. 50

    Chapter Four: Analysis

    4-1- Introduction. 53

    4-2- Specifications of experts. 53

    4-2-1- Descriptive study of statistical sample of gender variable. 54

    4-2-2- Descriptive study of statistical sample of age variable. 55

    4-2-3- Descriptive study of the variable statistical sample of education level. 55

    4-2-4- Descriptive study of the statistical sample of work experience variable. 56

    4-3- Findings 57

    4-3-1- The main question: main and secondary factors affecting the evaluation. 57

    4-3-2- The first sub-question: Prioritizing the main and secondary factors affecting the evaluation. 62

    4-3-3- The second sub-question: rating of insurance companies. 68

    Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions

    5-1- Introduction. 76

    5-2- Research findings. 77

    5-3- Discussion and comparison. 78

    5-4- Research suggestions. 79

    Sources and references: 80

    The first appendix. 86

    Second Appendix 92

    Third Appendix: Calculations and software output. 98

    English abstract. 110

    Source:

    Persian sources:

    Azer, Adel and Rajabzadeh, Ali, (1388). Applied decision-making (MADM approach), Negah Danesh Publications, Tehran. Anwari Rostami, Ali Asghar and Hosseini, Seyed Hamid, (2004). Analytical review of the model and performance evaluation model of the country's executive bodies. The Second International Conference on Total Quality Management and Global Business. Pashaizad, Hossein (2009) "A Glimpse of the Delphi Method", Pik Noor, 6th Year, Issue 2, pp. 63-79. pp. 31-60.

    Taghizadeh, Rasool and Fazli, Safar, (2010). The method of measuring the performance of companies using the combined approach of gray relationship analysis and fuzzy TOPSIS. Industrial Management Quarterly, 2, 150-125.

    Chavoshi, Kazem, Kishori, Marzieh and Arman, Mohammad Hossein. Measuring the level of efficiency of intellectual capital in Iran's insurance industry, International Conference on Insurance Industry: Challenges and Opportunities, 2017.

    Dagheghi, Alireza and Prizadi, Issa and Tayar, Shahin (2012) "Prioritization of different systems for monitoring the wealth of insurance companies using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique", Insurance Research Quarterly, Spring 2012,

    Daghighi Maal, Alireza and Parizadi, Issa and Tayar, Shahin (2012) "Prioritization of different systems for monitoring the wealth of insurance companies using the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) technique", Insurance Research Quarterly, Spring 2012, No. 109, pp. 1-31.

    Hassanzadeh, Hamidreza, Zare, Mohammad Sadegh. (1387), explanation of performance evaluation indicators of private insurance companies using balanced score method with expert opinion, Sanat Insurance Quarterly, No. 3 and 4, 7-36.

    Sukhkian, Mohammad Ali, Valipour, Hashem and Fayazi, Lida (1389). Multi-criteria method (MCDM) for stock selection in Tehran Stock Exchange using financial variables. Financial Engineering and Portfolio Management, 1(5), 35-53.

    Safaei Qadiklai, Abdul Hamid and Khalili Asboi, Saber, (2013), theoretical comparison of organizational performance evaluation strategies using the combination of data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard. The 4th National Conference on Data Envelopment Analysis, Mazandaran University, Babolsar.

    Safaei Qadiklai, Abdul Hamid and Khalili Asboi, Saber, (2011). Theoretical comparison of organizational performance evaluation strategies using multi-criteria decision making techniques. The first national accounting, financial management and investment conference, Golestan University of Applied Sciences, Gorgan.

    Adli, Alireza (2004). Evaluation of the performance of the police force of the Islamic Republic of Iran in establishing order and security in Bam city. Master's thesis, University of Police Sciences.

    Abde Tabrizi, Hossein (2008) "The role of the insurance industry in globalized capital markets", Insurance Industry Quarterly, No. 64, pp.93-109.

    Falah, Mohammad Ali, (2010). Presenting the performance management model for Isfahan State University using the combination of balanced scorecard and hierarchical analysis process method, master's thesis, Isfahan University, Economic Affairs Research Institute.

    Qodsipour, S.H. (1379) "Hierarchical Data Analysis Process", Tehran: Amir Kabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Publishing Center.

    Moradzadeh Fard, Mehdi and Mouszadeh Abbasi, Nouruddin and Mashashaei, Seyyed Mohammad (1390). Presentation of a new model in financial rating and evaluation of companies (case study: basic metals industry of Tehran Stock Exchange), Financial Engineering and Portfolio Management Journal, 5, 53-35.

    Momini, Mansour and Najafi Moghadam, Ali (2004). Evaluation of the economic performance of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange using the TOPSIS model, Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 66, 52-41.

    Mehdavi, Ghadir and Siflo, Sajjad (1389) "Insurance Development Solutions in the Money and Capital Market", Insurance and Development Seminar, 17th National Conference and 3rd International Insurance and Development Seminar, oral presentation.

    Mehrgan, Mohammad Reza, Advanced Operational Research, Tehran: Academic Book Publishing, third edition, 2007.

    Official website of Central Insurance of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 04/03/2013, www.centinsur.ir.

    Official website of Tehran Stock Exchange, 04/05/2013, http://www.irbourse.com.

    Official website of Asia Insurance Company, 12/03/1393, www.bimehasia.com.

    Official website of Dana Insurance Company, 03/04/1393, www.dana-insurance.com.

    Official website of Alborz Insurance Company, 03/04/1393, www.alborzinsurance.ir.

    Official website of Bima Mellat Company, 03/04/1393, www.mellatinsurance.com.

    Official website of Parsian Insurance Company, 03/04/2013, www.parsianinsurance.i

     

    Latin sources:

    Alipour, M., A., (2012). The effect of Intellectual Capital on Firm Performance: an insurance companies investigation of Iran. MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, VOL. 16 NO. 1 2012, pp. 53-66.

    Amado, C., A., F., Santos, S., P., Marques, P., M., (2012). Integrating the Data Envelopment Analysis and the Balanced Scorecard approach for enhanced performance assessment. Omega, Vol 40, pp: 390-403.

    Balzentis, A., Balzentis, T., Misiunas, A., (2012). An integrated assessment of Lithuanian economic sectors based on financial ratios and fuzzy MCDM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 18(1), 34-53.

    Bayrakdaroglu, A., Yalcin, N., (2012). Strategic Financial Performance Evaluation of the Turkish Companies Traded on ISE. EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW, 12(4), 529-539.

    Chou, W., C., Cheng, Y., P., (2012). A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating website quality of professional accounting firms. Expert System with Applications, 39, 2783-2793.

    Cravens, K., S., Oliver, E., G., Stewart, J., S., (2010). Can a positive approach to performance evaluation accomplish your goals? Kelley School of Business, 53, 269-279.

Evaluation of financial performance and rating of insurance companies active in the stock exchange