Investigating the influencing factors on the transfer of organizational knowledge (case study of Sina Industrial and Commercial Group)

Number of pages: 170 File Format: Not Specified File Code: 29344
Year: Not Specified University Degree: Not Specified Category: Management
Tags/Keywords: organization
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the influencing factors on the transfer of organizational knowledge (case study of Sina Industrial and Commercial Group)

    Dissertation for Master's degree (M.A)

    Treatment: Business Management

    Summer 1991

    Abstract

    Undoubtedly, organizational knowledge management in today's knowledge-oriented world is the key to success and pioneering. Rapid changes, shifts in powers, increasing complexity, the format of rapid scientific and technological advances are among the characteristics of today's world, but what is most important in the fourth wave of human life is the age Knowledge has shown the importance of knowledge transfer and team learning as one of  Important strategies for managers of contemporary complex organizations, knowledge that has become the most important determinant of power and wealth in societies. And the use of tacit and implicit knowledge of people to take advantage of existing knowledge and information and transfer it is a determining factor in the implementation of knowledge management strategy. Knowledge is a fluid mixture of experiences, values, existing information, and expert and systematic attitudes, which provides a framework for evaluating and applying new experiences and information. Knowledge arises in the mind of the scholar and is used. Knowledge in organizations is manifested not only in documents and knowledge reserves, but also in the work procedures of organizational processes, practices and norms.

    In this research, using the conceptual framework presented, the role and special organizational factors affecting the transfer of organizational knowledge and the impact of this transfer on organizational innovation capabilities are evaluated. For this purpose, by collecting 162 questionnaires from experts and managers of different organizational levels at the level of companies of Sina Trading Group, and after obtaining the obtained information, using spss software, the analysis and statistical processing of the obtained data was carried out. In this research, using the information obtained from the data output, the direct and indirect effect of organizational factors on the transfer of knowledge and innovation has been proven, and they have been ranked in terms of the degree of influence on the transfer of organizational knowledge in order of priority. 1- Culture of trust 2- Learning strategy style 3- Information technology 4- Flexible structure has been discussed in the statistical society. According to the findings of the research, management can use the optimal allocation of resources to better determine preferences so that opportunities for knowledge transfer and organizational performance can be strengthened. Introduction

      In an age where knowledge is the determining factor of the power and wealth of societies, the management and transfer of knowledge has become the most important task of societies and organizations within them, organizations that effectively acquire, create, transfer and use knowledge to improve and improve their activities and performance. Without knowledge, the organization cannot organize itself and continue its existence as a living and dynamic army. Organizations are determined to acquire knowledge and use it. Managers who make difficult decisions are looking for experienced people to constantly expose their knowledge to decisions instead of searching for information in databases. According to the studies conducted, two-thirds of managers obtain their information and knowledge by referring to writings and documents (Davenport, 1379) [1] Knowledge moves and advances organizations and is one of the important factors in empowering organizations to compete in the supply of the new global economy. Today, organizations have an urgent need to increase quality, value, services and speed in order to expand in the market, and this flow will definitely become more important in the future and will be considered as the biggest organizational competitive advantage in the world economy. Knowledge transfer refers to efforts that use methods such as flexible structure, trust culture, learning strategy style and information technology to formulate knowledge transfer and personalize it, and studying this transfer in obtaining innovative capabilities in organizations such as services, products, innovation  It is a process and technique. In such a situation, at least three main reasons for knowledge transfer are listed, which are: knowledge acquisition and reuse and creation of knowledge, managers' attention to the category of knowledge and its transfer, knowledge workers and intellectual capital have become a prerequisite for the survival and success of organizations.

    Chapter One

    Research Overview

    Introduction

    The general purpose of management is to strengthen organizational wisdom to make optimal decisions and increase innovation and strengthen performance and sustainable competitive outcomes. (Davenport and Pruska, 1988, page 84) [2] Creating such wisdom requires the continuous creation of new knowledge and the transfer and interpretation of this new knowledge in the body of current knowledge of other parts of the organization. (Kusunuki and others, 1988, p. 84) [3] The creation of knowledge, especially the explicit knowledge that is obtained by information systems and technology [4] in the organization (Stewart, 1988, p. 84) [5] plays an important role in the process of formulating the organization's strategies. But creating and transferring tacit knowledge is still considered a black box [6]. The transfer and application of tacit knowledge and its impact on organizational innovation and performance are still unclear. Knowledge is not new, but its open acceptance as capital is a new understanding. Today, the need to use knowledge in organizations for the desire for strategic values ??has become more important. The effectiveness of knowledge transfer is affected by important organizational factors such as structure, culture, processes, and information technology strategy (Lavis et al. 2003 p. 84) [7] Despite numerous studies conducted to establish the relationship between knowledge management and innovation (Clantoni et al. 2002) [8] as well as knowledge management and better organizational performance, the relationship between knowledge transfer and organizational performance and between innovation and organizational performance has not yet been clarified. In this research, through examining the direct and indirect effects of organizational factors on the transfer of knowledge in organizations, it tries to fill the aforementioned gap and also to examine the relationships between knowledge transfer and innovation capabilities in services and products, as well as innovation in process and technique (Gerods et al., 2008, p. 84) and understanding that are obtained through experience, study, discovery and mental communication and are recorded in different forms, and the purpose of knowledge management is to identify, acquire, organize, store and transfer appropriate knowledge in order to improve and change the perceptions and performance of employees at different levels of the organization at the appropriate time, which prevents the departure of intellectual and mental assets from the organization when knowledge agents leave. it is difficult Over time, organizational knowledge becomes more complex. But by using patterns of confrontation between people and technology and by promoting organizational culture, difficult situations can be dealt with. This interaction can be called a kind of consensus in the sense that the complex tasks of the organization are not done by one person, but technologies, people and interactions are necessary to achieve these difficult tasks. Acknowledging that not all mental content can be easily identified, stored and transferred, and everything from explicit knowledge to  As we move tacit-conceptual knowledge, their management becomes more difficult to exchange. Knowledge management consists of various elements such as knowledge production, knowledge acquisition, knowledge storage and transfer and sharing. Therefore, when the topic of knowledge transfer is discussed, it is assumed that the desired knowledge has already been produced and acquired and is ready to be transferred to others or to its own bases for use by people in the future. face to face In any case, it can be said that knowledge transfer includes the movement, distribution and spread of knowledge between people and mechanized and non-mechanized knowledge bases in a two-way manner, for which two types of strategies can be imagined, the strategy of transfer from person to documents and the strategy of transfer from person to person. These maps can be created through various activities. In fact, by resorting to the knowledge management system, along with other sources of providing educational needs, the management of education and human resources development can eliminate the lack of information and knowledge in time and lead to the horizontal growth of people in jobs.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the influencing factors on the transfer of organizational knowledge (case study of Sina Industrial and Commercial Group)

    Abstract..1

    Introduction..2

    Chapter One: General Research

    1-1- Introduction..4

    2-1- Statement of the problem.5

    3-1- Importance and application of research.6

    1-3-1- Importance and application of research from a theoretical point of view.6

    2-3-1- Importance and application of research from a theoretical point of view. Users. 6

    4-1- Research objectives. 7

    1-4-1- Main (general) research objectives. 7

    2-4-1- Secondary (special) research objectives. 7

    5-1- Research theoretical framework. 7

    6-1- Analytical model. 8

    8-1- Territory and spatial and temporal research. 9

    9-1- Conceptual definition of words and terms.9

    Chapter two: Review of research literature

    1-2 Part one: Review of definitions, reforms and concepts.12

    1-1-2-Organizational factors.22

    2-1-2-Definition of knowledge.23

    3-1-2-Types of knowledge.24

    4-1-2-Knowledge and knowledge management.26

    5-1-2-Hidden knowledge and open knowledge.26

    6-1-2-Individual knowledge and collective (organizational) knowledge.26

    7-1-2-The nature of collective knowledge.28

    8-1-2-Personal knowledge versus organizational knowledge.30

    1-8-1-2- Movement among these cells.35

    2-8-1-2- The role of organizations in creating organizational knowledge.35

    9-1-2- Information technology.36

    1-9-1-2- Components of information technology.37

    2-9-1-2- Applications of information technology in the organization.38

    10-1-2- Technology transfer.39

    11-1-2- E-learning.39

    12-1-2- Personalization.39

    13-1-2- Trust culture.43

    14-1-2- Trust and its dimensions.44

    15-1-2- Trust building.45

    16-1-2- Trust and institutionalization. 46

    17-1-2- Trust as the foundation of leadership. 47

    18-1-2- Trust building and types of organizations. 47

    19-1-2- Trust and fairness. 47

    20-1-2- Lack of trust among employees. 49

    21-1-2- Lack of organizational trust. 49

    22-1-2- Knowledge transfer and application. 50

    2-23-1- Knowledge sharing.51

    24-1-2- Creativity and growth of innovation.54

    25-1-2- Types and principles of innovation.56

    26-1-2- Knowledge management and transfer processes with innovation.59

    2-2- Second part: Methodologies, comparisons, experiences.65

    1-2-2- Introduction.65

    2-2-2- Popular schools of thought in knowledge management.66

    3-2-2- Knowledge classification methods.68

    4-2-2- Intellectual capital methods.70

    5-2-2- Social structure methods.71

    6-2-2- Multi-step conceptual method E.74

    7-2-2- Implementation methods and knowledge management system.75

    8-2-2- Organizational efforts to manage and transfer organizational knowledge.76

    3-2- Part three: Organizational knowledge transfer models.78

    1-3-2- Introduction.78

    2-3-2- Nonaka model.78

    3-3-2- Knowledge flow and processing model.80

    4-3-2- Participatory model in teaching and learning.82

    5-3-2- Implicit knowledge model.82

    6-3-2- Knowledge spiral.83

    7-3-2- Knowledge process model.84

    8-3-2- Network models and 85

    9-3-2- Knowledge management system diffusion model. 86

    10-3-2- Conceptual model of knowledge management. 86

    11-3-2- Reference model of knowledge management. 87

    12-3-2- Conclusions from the conducted studies. 88

    Chapter 3: Methodology of research

    1-3- Introduction. 91

    2-3- Research method.91

    3-3- Statistical population.92

    4-3- Sample and sampling method.92

    5-3- Time frame of the research.94

    7-3- Scale of sampling.95

    8-3- Review of questionnaire criteria.96

    9-3- Validity review of research questionnaire.99

    10-3- Experimental method and data analysis. 100

    1-10-3- Test to examine the relationship between variables. 100

    2-10-3- Correlation coefficients (Spearman). 101

    Chapter four: Data analysis

    1-4- Introduction. 103

    2-4- Descriptive analysis of variables. Research. 103

    1-2-4- Descriptive analysis of gender variable. 103

    2-2-4- Descriptive analysis of education variable. 104

    3-2-4- Descriptive analysis of age variable. 105

    4-2-4- Descriptive analysis of work experience variable. 106

    3-4- Statistical analysis of questions about technology. Information. 107

    1-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the information technology variable. 109

    2-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the questions raised regarding the learning strategy variable. 110

    3-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the learning strategy variable. 111

    4-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the questions raised regarding the trust culture variable. 112

    5-3-4- Analysis Descriptive variable of trust culture. 113

    6-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the questions raised regarding the design and structure of flexibility. 114

    7-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the variable design and structure of flexibility. 115

    8-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the questions raised regarding the variable of knowledge transfer compilation. 116

    9-3-4- Descriptive analysis of the variable of knowledge compilation. 117

    10-3-4- Descriptive analysis of questions raised regarding knowledge transfer. 118

    11-3-4- Descriptive analysis of knowledge transfer variable. 119

    4-4- Statistical analysis of research hypotheses. 120

    1-4-4- Inferential analysis of hypothesis number one. 121

    2-4-4- Inferential analysis of hypothesis no. 2. 122

    3-4-4- Inferential analysis of hypothesis number three. 124

    4-4-4- Inferential analysis of hypothesis number four. 126

    5-4-4- Inferential analysis of hypothesis number five. 128

    5-4- Comparative study of the impact of information technology variables, learning strategy style, trust culture and flexible structure on knowledge transfer variable 129

    Chapter Five: Conclusions and Suggestions

    1-5- The first part: An overview of the research done in the world. 132

    1-1-5- Introduction..132

    2-1-5- The research done in this field. 133

    2-5- The second part: The results of the research. 133

    1-1-2-5- the result of hypothesis 1.134

    2-1-2-5- the result of hypothesis 2.134

    3-1-2-5- the result of hypothesis 3.134

    4-1-2-5- the result of hypothesis 4.134

    5-1-2-5- the result of hypothesis 5.135

    2-2-5- General conclusion.135

    3-2-5- Recommendations and suggestions.136

    1-3-2-5- Suggestions for the first hypothesis.136

    2-3-2-5- Suggestions for the second hypothesis.137

    3-3-2-5- Suggestions for the third hypothesis.137

    4-3-2-5- Proposals of the fourth hypothesis. 138

    5-3-2-5- Proposals of the fifth hypothesis. 139

    4-2-5- Research limitations. 139

    1-4-2-5- Credit limitation. 139

    2-4-2-5- Limitation in data preparation. 139

    Appendices:

    Questionnaire.

Investigating the influencing factors on the transfer of organizational knowledge (case study of Sina Industrial and Commercial Group)