Investigating the relationship between business strategy and profit quality in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

Number of pages: 149 File Format: Not Specified File Code: 29304
Year: Not Specified University Degree: Not Specified Category: Librarianship
  • Part of the Content
  • Contents & Resources
  • Summary of Investigating the relationship between business strategy and profit quality in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

     Abstract

    The main purpose of the research is to examine the relationship between business strategy and profit quality in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange. The statistical sample of the research includes 145 companies admitted to the May Stock Exchange, whose data was collected and analyzed for a period of 5 years (1387 to 1391).

    In this research, the correlation method was used to test the hypotheses. The statistical analysis of the data was done at the 95% confidence level, and the hypotheses were tested using the statistical method of panel data and the linear regression model. The research results show that resistance companies tend to adopt conservatism and profit management more than exploration companies. Also, macro environments Economic changes the relationship between business strategy and profit quality at the level of profit management index. While macroeconomic environments do not significantly affect the relationship between business strategy and profit quality at the level of conservatism index. Key words: conservatism, profit management, exploratory strategy, resistance strategy.

     

    1-1) Introduction

    In recent years, the concept of strategy has received significant attention in organizational literature and by financial researchers. In theoretical evidence, strategy is defined as the organization's will and planning to achieve long-term organizational goals and forecasting the necessary resources to achieve these goals. The strategy of profit-making units may have different consequences for them. Therefore, choosing a strategy requires analyzing the company's current information and thinking about its results.

    One of the results of adopting different strategies in companies is its effects on their financial reporting behaviors, which may be of great concern to managers and owners. Because today, information is considered an important strategic tool in decision-making, and without a doubt, the quality of decisions depends on the correctness, accuracy, and timeliness of the information that is provided to people at the time of decision-making. In the financial markets, this information can be reflected in the form of various signs, symptoms, news and forecasts from inside or outside the company and become available to shareholders, causing reactions and as a result changes in stock prices (Nuralhaq et al.[1], 2013). 

    Conservatism as one of the limiting principles of accounting has been used by accountants for years and despite many criticisms of it, It has always maintained its position among other accounting principles. so that‌ The durability and survival of conservatism in the face of criticism over many years can be seen as a proof of the fundamental principles of this principle. Also, conservatism can be mentioned as a mechanism that, if applied correctly, will lead to the solution of many problems of representation and information asymmetry, which generally results from the ever-increasing gap between managers and suppliers of financial resources of business units. Considering the importance of the role of conservatism, the need for criteria to accurately measure it in financial reporting seems necessary.

    The aim of this research is to investigate the relationship between business strategy and profit quality of companies admitted to the Tehran Stock Exchange. As an overview of the research, this chapter gives a general look at the research and familiarizes the reader with what is going to be analyzed. Based on this, in the current chapter, the main problem and the necessity of conducting the research are first explained. Then the research assumptions and generalities of the studied statistical population and the intended methods for data analysis are explained. At the end of the chapter, variables and key words are presented and defined operationally.

    1-2) Statement of the main research problem

    According to many financial experts, the most important tasks of management in the financial field are to decide on four main issues; Investment decisions (capital budgeting), financing decisions, dividend distribution decisions in joint stock companies and decisions related to working capital. These decisions are interdependent and must be made in order to maximize the value of the company for the shareholders.

    The concept of strategy in the organizational literature was developed in the 1950s by researchers at the Harvard School of Economics (Snow and Hambrick [2], 1980). According to Chandler's definition, strategy means "determining long-term investment goals and using the necessary resources to implement these goals." . Mintzberg [3] (1987) argues that an organizational strategy refers to a plan, pattern, position and vision of a company or industry. In this study, we will focus on the implementation of business strategy using the scientific indicators proposed by Snow and Hambrick. Esno and Hambrick (1980) have emphasized that Mills and Esno's research [4] (1978) has completely described the strategic orientation of an organization.

    Mills and Esno (1978), with studies in the field of industrial organizations, using two criteria of "market dynamics" and "orientation of competitors" which are presented in the article of Emery and Trieste (1965), divided the environments into four categories and suggested a specific strategy for each of these environments. These strategies were defensive, exploratory, reactive and analytical. These strategies show that the organization, in any environmental situation; how to choose one's territory, how to organize technologies, and how to innovate.

    Mills and Snow (1978) have also emphasized that exploratory and resistance strategies have the greatest effect. We will classify resistance.

    Mills and Snow (1978) and Hambrick (1983) emphasize that exploratory companies have a stronger commitment to product development, innovation and product change. These companies are present in relatively unpredictable business environments and try to discover new opportunities through continuous market research. exploratory companies promote productivity in the guro of innovation. These companies thrive in environments that change slowly. In contrast to resistance companies, they emphasize performance efficiency and a low level of product development and market defense (Mills and Snow 1978). Hambrick (1983) explains that resistant companies have a greater tendency to compete in price, delivery, or work quality; Capital-resistant companies make a huge investment in the engineering process and have a mechanical structure and are influenced by production management and accounting.

    In order to examine the relationship between business strategy and profit quality, we refer to the following 3 theories:

    Theory Representation (Jensen and Meckling[5], 1976), political cost theory (Watz and Zimmerman[6], 1978), transaction cost theory (Kais[7], 1976).

    According to Jensen and Meckling (1976), an agency relationship based on which one or more owners appoint another person as a representative or agent on their behalf and delegate decision-making to him they do, it has costs such as the costs of owners monitoring the representative's performance, commitment costs and residual losses.

    Jensen and Meckling (1976) believe that managers prioritize their own interests in making decisions. so that if the interests of the managers and owners of the company are aligned; The managers' decisions will be in line with the interests of the company, and if the interests of the managers and owners of the company are not aligned; Managers' decisions will be in line with their personal interests. According to the belief of Jensen and Meckling, it can be argued that managers take steps in the direction of their own interests by manipulating the accounting profit (profit management) in making strategic decisions of the company. Also, both political cost theory (Watts and Zimmerman 1978) and transaction cost (Kais, 1937) refer to managers' motivations to use profit-seeking accounting methods (Nuralhaq et al., 2013). According to political cost theory, Watts and Zimmerman [8] (1978) argue that in managerial decision making (Including accounting decisions) Managers must examine the macro regulatory environment. It goes on to say that accounting financial statements are made available to the public to help make decisions, and influence their decisions.

  • Contents & References of Investigating the relationship between business strategy and profit quality in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange

    1-1) Introduction. 2

    1-2) statement of the main problem of the research. 3

    1-3) The necessity of doing research. 8

    1-4) research objectives. 9

    1-5) research hypotheses. 9

    1-6) research method. 10

    1-7) Information gathering method. 10

    1-8) the time domain of research. 11

    1-8-1) The time domain of research. 11

    1-8-2) The spatial territory of research. 11

    1-9) definition of research terms. 11

    1-10) research structure. 12

    1-11) chapter summary. 13

    2-1) Introduction. 15

    Part I: Company strategy. 16

    2-1) Company strategy. 16

    2-1-1) Definitions strategy 21

    2-1-2) Strategy and its types. 25

    2-1-2-1) Main strategies: 25

    2-1-2-2) Secondary strategies. 27

    2-1-2-3) competitive strategies. 31

    2-1-3) business strategies in competitive markets. 33

    2-1-3-1) Porter's differentiation strategy. 33

    2-1-3-2) cost leadership strategy. 35

    The third part: profit management. 38

    2-2) The concept of profit management. 38

    2-2-2) types of profit management methods. 41

    2-2-3) Types of profit management: 46

    2-2-4) Profit management patterns. 49

    2-2-4-1) pattern of obtaining peace. 49

    2-2-4-2) profit maximization pattern. 50

    2-2-4-3) profit minimization pattern. 50

    2-2-4-4) profit smoothing pattern. 51

    2-2-4) Motives of profit management. 51

    2-2-4-1) meeting the expectations of financial analysts. 51

    2-2-4-3) Profit smoothing over a long period of time with appropriate growth. 53

    2-2-4-4) meeting the needs of the bonus plan. 53

    2-2-4-5) Changing management. 54

    2-2-4-6) Contract between managers and owners: 54

    2-2-4-7) Contract between managers and creditors: 55

    2-2-4-8) Motives related to the first public offering. 56

    2-2-5) Who are the victims of profit management? 56

    2-2-6) Good profit management versus bad profit management. 57

    The third part: profit conservatism. 58

    2-3) The concept of conservatism. 58

    2-3-1) The importance of conservatism. 62

    2-3-2) The position of conservatism in accounting standards. 63

    2-3-3) Applications of conservatism in the capital market and financial statements. 64

    2-3-4) Conservatism evaluation criteria. 66

    2-3-4-1) criteria of net assets 66

    2-3-4-2) criteria of profit and accrual items. 67

    2-3-4-3) criteria for the relationship between profits and stock returns. 68

    The fourth part: Research background. 68

    2-4) Research background. 68

    2-4-1) Research conducted abroad. 68

    2-4-2) Research conducted inside the country. 71

    3-1) Introduction. 77

    3-2) research method. 77

    3-3) Statistical society. 78

    3-4) Sampling method. 78

    3-5) Statistical sample size. 79

    3-6) Data collection method 80

    3-7) Research period. 80

    3-8) research assumptions. 80

    3-9) research variables and how to calculate them 81

    3-9-1) research dependent variable(s). 81

    3-9-2) independent research variable(s). 83

    3-9-3) control variables. 84

    3-10) Method of hypothesis testing. 86

    3-10-1) First hypothesis test model. 86

    3-10-2) Second hypothesis test model. 87

    3-10-3) Third hypothesis test model. 88

    3-11) method of analysis and hypothesis testing. 88

    3-11-1) Panel data method. 88

    3-11-1-1) fixed effects method: 90

    3-11-1-2) random effects method: 91

    3-11-1-3) Chow or F-Limmer test: 91

    3-11-1-4) Hausman test: 93

    3-11-2) model significance test. 94

    3-11-3) Significance test of research variables. 94

    3-11-4) Tests related to the assumptions of the linear regression model. 95

    3-11-4-1) Assumption of normality of variables and residuals: 95

    3-11-4-2) Assumption of non-collinearity between independent variables: 96

    3-11-4-3) Assumption of independence of residuals: 96

    3-11-4-4) Assumption of equality of variance of residuals: 97

    3-11-5) Deciding to reject or accept hypotheses 98

    4-1) Introduction. 101

    4-2) The test of the normality of the distribution of variables 102

    4-3) The results of the research hypothesis test. 105

    4-3-1) Testing the first research hypothesis. 105

    2-3-4) The results of the second research hypothesis test. 108

    3-3-4) Test results of the third research hypothesis. 111

    1-3-3-4) The results of the third hypothesis test at the level of conservatism. 111

    2-3-3-4) Test of the third hypothesis at the profit management level. 114

    4-5) Summary of the results of hypothesis testing. 117

Investigating the relationship between business strategy and profit quality in companies listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange